Two Spirits
Glory be to God for dappled things! — Gerard Manley Hopkins, “Pied Beauty”.
In my short career as bloggist, whenever I’ve received a comment, I’ve gone to check out the commenter’s blog. This past week I had two blogs to investigate. Both were written by men, and both have a certain bluntness to them, but the similarities pretty much end there. It was a sheep-and-goat experience for me, to retain one blogger’s comment (and therefore his link) and to delete the other.
The zapped blogger sent me to a page which made me think he hadn’t seen enough of my writing to notice that I’m an Irish-descended queer from the colonies. Breathtakingly offensive. But enough of him.
The other blogger…man, this guy works hard! Urban Observation’s stuff is gritty and honest and courageously personal. From the few pages I dipped into, I learned that he’s an American of African descent who grew up in the Bronx ghetto. He studied well enough to land a decent office job when he grew up. For his pains, he’s been labelled an “Oreo”, a traitor to his race. And yet — if I got this right — he’s come home to his neighbourhood, the ghetto from which he had always been encouraged to escape.
Let’s see, get out the books on myths and archetypes, flip-flip-flip, protagonist leaves ordinary world, goes to other world, returns with increased wisdom to own world, that makes him… a hero.
An earlier entry of mine, in which I explained how my pets got their names, was called “Adam’s First Task”. Long before Adam became a dirt farmer and sweaty baker, his first job was to name all the animals. Naming is fundamental to human language, which in turn is fundamental to human interaction. A string of letters becomes a word only by consensus, which means that at least two people must agree on its meaning. Unfortunately — ironically? — to define a word is also to limit it.
Apparently, to some of Urban Observation’s acquaintances, the meaning of “black” doesn’t include “decently-paid office worker”. A South-east Asian classmate of mine referred to her husband as a “banana”, which is the Asian equivalent of an Oreo. Most, if not all, lesbigay Christians have had the experience of other people believing that “queer Christian” is an oxymoron. And on it goes, with language, the tool that should increase the human capacity for love and acceptance, being used instead as a weapon to tamp us into restrictive little boxes and jab us with narrow pointy sticks.
Once upon a time, certain tribes preferred two-spirited people — those who had an innate understanding of both masculine and feminine ways of being — to be their shamans. They were the holy men and women, the unusual ones, the ones who had visited two worlds.
I need to rush off to work now, but I will leave the final word to a Cardigan Welsh Corgi whose wisdom I missed the first time around: Checkers suggested, during the “Name-and-genderize-the-sea-turtle-stuffy” contest, that the turtle’s gender should be green.
April 11, 2008 at 2:52 pm
I think it’s a shame that, in what’s supposed to be a progressive, advanced, and enlightened world, there is still such incredible prejudice and stereotyping among people. I understand that there is a little bit of animal nature there, instinct buried under years and years of culture and civilization (a little like rape is, at its basest, the animal instinct to spread one’s genes by opportunistic means), but, like rape, we’re supposed to be an advanced species; if we deign to classify ourselves as above animals, why do we still act like them?
I grew up in an extremely white community. I can recall less than half a dozen visible minority families in our small town, but in our little high school of 500, these six or seven kids were well-liked, well-accepted, and generally had many friends. Perhaps it was this context of exposure, perhaps it was just my limited experience, but for a long time I believed that other races, blacks especially, were still crying wolf after the wolf had left the building. And yet, the more I hear and learn, the more I realize that people are just as prejudiced as ever, that these other racial groups still do have valid claims, and that for all our proclamations of equality, we still don’t really act as an equal society. We celebrate Black History Month, or womens’ rights - acts of equality that we like to look at and say, “gosh, good thing we’re not like that anymore.” And yet we have huge contention over same-sex marriage. We’re not all that changed, after all.
April 11, 2008 at 3:55 pm
I did not know I was wise. I just call ‘em as I see them!
Dogs keep it simple. If a person is nice, that’s all that matters. And of course slip us a treat now and then…
April 11, 2008 at 8:00 pm
Again an amazing post. You know, I’d really like to live in a world where people were not so interested in putting everyone into ‘boxes’. I don’t know but it seems to me that it is all about exclusion, this is mine not yours, and I haven’t worked out why this desire for exclusion appeals so much to some people.
I love Checkers response. People everywhere should take their example from the wonderful acceptance of dogs.
April 11, 2008 at 9:06 pm
Your post shows how, despite society having become superficially more civilized, the nastiness has really just gone underground, not disappeared. I agree with themarvelousinnature: people are still as prejudiced as ever. And I admit that I’m prejudiced, too, although it’s hard for me to recognize all the zillions of tiny invisible ways I benefit as a middle class white person in a society where I am part of what is defined as “normal” (white isn’t a colour, eh?). I expect respect and good treatment from other people; that’s what I find “normal”, but other people aren’t so lucky, yet I’m blind to it. We have a long way to go…
April 12, 2008 at 6:57 am
Thank you all for your responses.
You’ve touched on another assumed oxymoron, Themarvelousinnature, that of liberal countryfolk. The Saskatoon Anglican Synod has just narrowly voted against a motion to allow church blessings of same-sex civil marriages. Just as many rural parishes voted for the motion as against it.
A package of virtual super-crunchy Rollover biscuits is goin’ out to Checkers in Ohio!
I think, Livingisdetail, that Gollum (and Peter Jackson and Andy Serkis did a terrific, creepy portrayal of this!) typifies your thought: “Sure you found the gold, but since it’s my birthday, it really belongs to me!” Any excuse will do to prove that you deserve someone else’s stuff.
Your ironic comment, Eyegillian, about white not being a colour, reminds me of an Anglo-Saxon-descent professor’s tale of driving through US customs some decades ago. He was taken aback when the official asked him his colour but, quick on his skates, my professor replied, “I’m sort of pinky-grey, I guess.”
April 13, 2008 at 11:28 am
The black community is rife with oxymorons. Within families, it is the “crabs in a barrel ” syndrome.
http://absurdtosublime.blogspot.com/2008/03/crabs-in-barrel.html
April 13, 2008 at 12:24 pm
Thanks for the link to the “Crabs in a Barrel” Jamaican fable, Haireality. I wonder if that was the mentality that lay behind the phenomenon of the Magdalene Laundries in Ireland?
April 13, 2008 at 5:09 pm
Thank you for stopping by. I appreciate the comment as well as your post.
April 13, 2008 at 7:21 pm
I’m glad you liked it, Urban Thought.